IN OUR VIEW: Statement on Federal Court Decision to Reinstate Digital Equity Act Grant Funding

In Our View image

Yesterday a federal district court judge ruled that Digital Equity Act programs should resume, although without any of the Act’s original race-based factors, which the judge deemed to be unconstitutional.

In response to the ruling in the on-going lawsuit filed by the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA), Christopher Mitchell, Director of the Community Broadband Networks initiative at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR), made the following statement:

“Yesterday’s ruling on the Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program is, on balance, a victory. The National Digital Inclusion Alliance deserves enormous credit for fighting to get to this point. The court affirmed what should have been obvious all along: the Trump administration had no legitimate basis to hold this program hostage. The only real question now is how quickly NTIA moves to actually implement it.”

“The removal of racial and ethnic minorities as a designated ‘covered population’ are  a loss because the Trump Administration continues to find ways to undermine populations that have been historically disadvantaged.  But I don’t think it will significantly change who the program actually serves or what work gets done on the ground. The Digital Equity Act’s continued focus on low-income communities, older adults and veterans means that the people who most need to be prioritized will still be prioritized. Due to historic discrimination, many racial minorities will remain the focus of the program due to their disproportionately low income.”

“Digital equity work does not cost the federal government money – our taxpayer dollars are used inefficiently when millions of people cannot access telehealth and similar services. Additionally, the benefits of federal investments into new Internet networks are greatly enhanced when more people are able to take advantage of modern technology.” 

The suit was brought by the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA), which challenged the administration’s decision to halt the Digital Equity Act program after President Donald Trump characterized it as “racist.”

Image
Court Order and Gavel

The $2.75 billion Digital Equity Act was passed by Congress as part of the 2021 infrastructure law. It mandated the creation of three different major grant programs intended to shore up equitable, widespread access to affordable Internet, while providing the tools and digital literacy education needed to help neglected U.S. communities get online. But in May 2024, the Trump administration unceremoniously “terminated” the Act, froze all program funding, and left countless states, programs and organizations – many on the cusp of major new efforts – high and dry.

In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge John D. Bates wrote

“The government has committed to reinstating the Competitive Grant Program upon a judicial determination that the race criterion is unconstitutional and severable.” 

Following the ruling, NDIA Executive Director Angela Siefer said:

"We are proud to have pushed to keep the Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program alive. This crucial program provides communities across the country not just with access or technology, but the skills, confidence, and pathways necessary to fully participate and thrive in our digital age. 

We fundamentally object to the government’s position that empowering Black and Brown communities is unconstitutional. This is why NDIA will continue to do what we have always done: fight for a future of full inclusion, ensuring that digital equity is a reality for all."